Translate this page into:
A New Era in Stereotactic Brain Biopsy: Frameless Navigation-Based System
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
Taweesomboonyat et al. presented their experience in frameless stereotactic brain biopsy in their article: “Diagnostic yield and complication of frameless stereotactic brain biopsy.”[1]
Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for brain tumors to make pathological diagnosis, to relieve mass effect, and to improve prognosis. If surgery is not feasible (deep-seated lesion or lesion located in the eloquent brain area, small, and/or multiple lesions), stereotactic brain biopsy is a viable option for histopathological assessment of the tumor to make further treatment plan.
Frame-based stereotactic brain biopsy systems have been used for a long time. Stereotactic brain biopsies have a mortality rate of 3.5%, over than expected even though they provide diagnosis with precision.[23] With technical and technological advancement, morbidity and mortality rates of stereotactic brain biopsies have steadily decreased from the 1980s to 2000s.[3] Through advancement in navigation technology, frameless stereotactic brain biopsy settings have been installed compatible with both magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT).[2] Pointer-based referencing that uses either fiducial markers or anatomical landmarks is employed in frameless stereotaxy.[4]
Frameless stereotactic brain biopsy has comparable accuracy and complication rates to frame-based systems. Frameless stereotaxy is convenient both for the patient (more comfortable setting) and surgeon (time- and cost-saving).[2567] It is even better to use a frameless stereotaxy system free of head fixation equipment (namely, Mayfield head holder), which is intolerable for awake patients, limits biopsy planning, and leads to postoperative complications (bone fracture, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and epidural hematoma).[8]
As a limitation of frameless stereotaxy, its accuracy is less for posterior fossa lesions.[6] The error of frameless stereotaxy in phantom subjects is 1.3–1.7 mm with MRI, even lesser with CT (1.1 mm ± 0.5 mm).[5] CT is also more beneficial than MRI in financial aspects for rural sites of the world.
As understanding of the main principles of frameless stereotactic brain biopsy is disseminated throughout the world, it would once replace frame-based systems in the near future.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
- Diagnostic yield and complication of frameless stereotactic brain biopsy. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2018;10:78-84.
- [Google Scholar]
- Clinical validation of true frameless stereotactic biopsy: Analysis of the first 125 consecutive cases. Neurosurgery. 2001;49:830-5.
- [Google Scholar]
- Mortality and discharge to home after closed brain biopsy: Analysis of 3523 cases from the state of California, 2003-2009. World Neurosurg. 2013;79:110-5.
- [Google Scholar]
- Image-guided frameless stereotactic needle biopsy in awake patients without the use of rigid head fixation. J Neurosurg. 2011;114:1414-20.
- [Google Scholar]
- Accuracy of true frameless stereotaxy:In vivo measurement and laboratory phantom studies. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 1999;90:160-8.
- [Google Scholar]
- Frameless stereotaxy with scalp-applied fiducial markers for brain biopsy procedures: Experience in 218 cases. J Neurosurg. 1999;91:569-76.
- [Google Scholar]
- Clinical experience with intracranial brain needle biopsy using frameless surgical navigation. Comput Aided Surg. 1998;3:33-9.
- [Google Scholar]
