|Year : 2018 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 193-196
Prevalence of psychiatric illness among residents of old age homes in Northern India
Shamsi Akbar, SC Tiwari, Rakesh K Tripathi, Nisha M Pandey, Ambrish Kumar
Department of Geriatric Mental Health, KG Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
|Date of Web Publication||11-Apr-2018|
Department of Geriatric Mental Health, KG Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Context: There are many factors which compelled older adults to live in old age homes (OAHs) and vulnerable to psychological problems. Studies reported high prevalence of mental health problems (20%–60%) among elderlies of OAHs. Therefore, the study was conducted to explore prevalence of psychiatric illness (PI) among residents of OAHs of Northern India. Settings and Design: The present study was conducted in OAHs of Districts Bareilly, Lucknow, Varanasi, Dehradun, and Haridwar, using cross-sectional descriptive study method. Sample Size were 306 (male – 98 [32.5%] and female n = 208 [68%]) residing in OAHs selected by means of purposive sampling. Subjects and Methods: Inclusion criteria: (a) older adults aged 60 years and above residing in OAHs and able to communicate. (b) Staying in OAHs for 6 months or more. (c) Able to understand comprehends and reply to questions and (d) Giving written informed consent. Exclusion criteria: (a) Residents who declined/not interested to participate in the study. (b) Residents having any sensory impairment/physical health problem which can impede the interview. Research tools were (i) a semi-structured pro forma, (ii) Hindi Mental Status Examination, (iii) Survey psychiatric assessment schedule, and (iv) Schedules for clinical assessment in neuropsychiatry-based clinical interview for diagnosis of PIs according to International Classification of Disease 10. Statistical Analysis Used: The quantitative data obtained was analyzed by means of frequency tables. Results: The results show overall prevalence of PI is 43% among residents of OAHs. The prevalence of PI was found to be higher among females compared to males. Depression was the most common among the residents of OAHs. Conclusions: There is an urgent need of trained professionals to provide professional help for highly prevalent psychiatric disorders among residents of OAHs.
Keywords: Depression, old age homes, prevalence, psychiatry, psychological problems
|How to cite this article:|
Akbar S, Tiwari S C, Tripathi RK, Pandey NM, Kumar A. Prevalence of psychiatric illness among residents of old age homes in Northern India. J Neurosci Rural Pract 2018;9:193-6
|How to cite this URL:|
Akbar S, Tiwari S C, Tripathi RK, Pandey NM, Kumar A. Prevalence of psychiatric illness among residents of old age homes in Northern India. J Neurosci Rural Pract [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 Jan 16];9:193-6. Available from: http://www.ruralneuropractice.com/text.asp?2018/9/2/193/229532
| Introduction|| |
Aging is a part of natural developmental process in the life of any living being. For human beings, it is not just a biological phenomenon; however, it has psychological and social implications too. With improved economic status and health-care facilities, the number of people living beyond age 60 years is rapidly increasing. Various authors agree on 65 years and above age as cutoff for defining old age . In the developing country, every sixth person is over 65 years of age. In the next 30 years, it will be every fourth person. India, with 1.27 billion people is the second most populous country in the world and population growth rate at 1.58%, is predicted to have more than 1.53 billion people by the end of 2030. Demographers have presumed that by the year 2050 more than 40% of people would only be elders in India. The enormous growth in the proportion of older adults in the country, change in family structure, and other contemporary changes in the psychosocial matrix and values often compel the elderly to live alone or to shift from their own homes to institutions and old age homes (OAHs).
The residents living in OAHs often confront problems due to highly institutionalized, depersonalized, and bureaucratic atmosphere in OAHs. Elderly living in such homes face problems of adjustment with tight and rigid schedules, separation from the family, isolation from the social milieu, anxiety over adopting oneself to a new environment, and close encounters with death and ailment in the institutions. A recent study reported that misbehavior of children (29.8%) and lack of financial support (29.3%) were the most common reasons for living in OAHs. All above factors make the older adults vulnerable to psychological problems. Studies indicate that the average prevalence of mental health problems among elderly is 41.3% in the community  and 64.4% living in OAHs. In India, overall prevalence of psychiatric illness (PI) among elderly aged 60 years and above found 33.9%. Depression was the most common psychiatric disorders in elderly living in OAHs. There is geographical (hills, plane, dessert, and sea), sociocultural (joint and nuclear families, different religions and their practices), vocational (farming, business, IT, fishing, unemployment, educational, retirement), and lifestyle (food habits, exercise, entertainment, clubs, and social service) diversity in India by different regions. Therefore, study findings of the other regions of the country cannot be generalized. Hence, this study was planned to find the prevalence of PI among residents of OAHs of different cities of the state of Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand in India which is situated in North region of the country based on a research work entitled “A Study of Psychiatric Morbidity, Quality of Life and Expectations of Inmates of OAHs in Northern India,” enrolled under PhD. Programme in the Department of Geriatric Mental Health, King George's Medical University Lucknow, approved by the Ethical Committee of King George Medical University. Only a part of above PhD thesis work is being presented in this paper.
The present study presents prevalence of PI among the residents of OAHs.
| Subjects and Methods|| |
The present study was conducted on purposely selected 306 residents of OAHs in the Districts of Bareilly, Lucknow, Varanasi, Dehradun, and Haridwar fulfilling inclusion/exclusion criteria. Of them, 98 (32.5%) were male and 208 female (68%). Inclusion criteria: (a) older adults aged 60 years and above residing in OAHs and able to communicate. (b) Staying in OAHs since 6 months or more. (c) Be able to understand comprehend and reply to questions, and (d) Giving written informed consent. Exclusion criteria: (a) Residents who declined/not interested to participate in the study. (b) Residents having any sensory impairment/physical health problem which can impede the interview of the research tools: (i) A semi-structured pro forma (ii) Hindi Mental Status Examination (HMSE), (iii) Survey Psychiatric Assessment Schedule (SPAS), and (iv) Schedules for clinical assessment in neuropsychiatry (SCAN)-based clinical interview for the diagnosis of PIs according to the International Classification of Disease (ICD) 10-diagnostic criteria and research.
A total number of OAHs in district Bareilly, Lucknow, Varanasi, Dehradun, and Haridwar were identified through help age India directory and local resources. There were two types of OAHs; 1. Private-in which inmates had to pay some amount per month, the other one was public type, i.e. free of cost. Permission was obtained for the present study from the administrative authority of identified OAHs. After getting permission from OAHs, data collection was done. Before collecting the data, written informed consent from all older adults was obtained. Socio-demographic details were obtained from the participants with help of semi-structured identification pro forma. HMSE was administered on included participants to screen cognitive Impairment. SPAS was used to screen the group of PI. Participants screened “in” on SPAS were further assessed through SCAN-based clinical interview for making specific diagnosis as per ICD-10 diagnostic criteria for research.
| Results|| |
The quantitative data obtained was analyzed by means of frequency tables in the following order.
Gender-wise comparison sociodemographic characteristics of older adults living in old age homes
[Table 1] shows a total number of 306 participants (98 male, 208 females) formed the sample of the study. Majority of the participants were in the age group of 60–69 years (38.2%), followed by 70–79 years (34.6%), and 80 years and above (27.1%). Mean age of the total sample was found to be 73.14 ± 9.002 years. Age wise there was no significant difference found between the male and female participants. Significant differences were found on the sociodemographic variables of education (P< 0.000), marital status (P< 0.000), and occupation (P< 0.000) between male and female participants. Their educational levels were as follows: illiterate were 32.0%, up to 8th standard were 21.5%, up to 12th standard were 21.5% followed by graduate and above at 26.4%. Marital status of the participants; 54.9% were widow/widower, followed by 27.4% who were married, 11.1% were never married, and 6.5% were separated/divorced. Their occupation levels; 52.9% were nonproductive workers followed by 33.3% who were retired, 7.5% were part-time workers, and 6.2% were in some kind of business. Sociodemographic details showed that most of the OAHs residents were females rather than males.
Prevalence of psychiatric illness among residents of old age homes
[Table 2] shows that there was a significant difference (P< 0.000) between both sexes regarding the prevalence of PI. The prevalence of PI was more in females (51%) as compared to males (28%).
| Discussion|| |
Majority of the study participants were between 60 and 69 years of age which is comparable to earlier studies. Further, most of them were female, illiterate, and widows/widowers. Similar findings were obtained through some of the previous studies., The lower educational status of study participants has been also reported by Purty et al. Most of the female inmates of OAHs said that they were homemakers and spent their whole time doing household work. The residents living in OAHs often confront problems due to highly institutionalized, depersonalized, and bureaucratic atmosphere in OAHs. Elderly living in such homes face problems of adjustment with tight and rigid schedules, separation from the family, isolation from the social milieu, anxiety over adopting oneself to a new environment and close encounters with death and ailment in the institutions. These factors make the older adults living in OAHs vulnerable to psychological problems. Followed by the psychiatric morbidity were elucidated in following order.
The findings were shown in the present study overall prevalence of PI is 43%, with prevalence in females at 51% and in males at 21%. This finding is supported by the study done by Tiwari et al. Depression (37.7%) was found to be the most common mental health problem whereas anxiety disorders (13.3%) and dementias (11.1%) were the least ,, and their studies highlight the need for proper assessment and confirmation of depression and anxiety, especially among the institutional elderly persons.
In the present study, depression was the most prevalent disorder (53.7%), followed by dementia (21.6%), and the least prevalent disorder being BPAD (0.7%). These findings were supported by a study by Kumar et al. In their study in India, more than half of the inhabitants of OAHs were found to be suffering from one or other mental health problems, depression being the most common one. Similar findings by Barua et al. show that the median prevalence rate of depression among the elderly Indian population was determined to be 21.9%, interquartile range = (11.6%–31.1%). Most common mental disorder which characterized by declining mood, loss of motivation, lack of physical energy, inability to feel pleasure, disturbed sleep, feelings of hopelessness, helplessness and worthlessness, and poor concentration in depression. Praveen Kumar et al. study showed high prevalence of depression and anxiety. Variations in the prevalence of depression and anxiety across many studies can be attributed to type of screening tools used. The prevalence of anxiety in this study was 94.6% among institutional elderly persons when compared with 92.6% among those living in the community. A comparative study was done on the psychiatric morbidity in the geriatric population. Singh et al. study reveals that the prevalence of anxiety was 5% among elderly population living in OAHs and 6.7% in elderly population in the community. A study done in Pune  reported that the prevalence of anxiety disorders was 6.4% among the elderly persons aged 65 years and older. Although the levels of anxiety among the elderly people varied from one study to the other, there was no significant difference between the institutional and noninstitutional elderly persons.
| Conclusions|| |
In the present study, findings revealed that 56% of the inmates of OAH had no PI while inmates suffering from PI were 43%. Depression is the most common disorder in older adults was five districts in Northern India.
The authors are thankful to the administrative personnel of the OAHs for their cooperation in the study. Authors also greatly appreciate the OAHs residents for participating in the study.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Kinsella K, David R. Phillips Global aging: The challenge of success. Popul Bull 2005;60:3-40.
Ramesh. Health status of elderly living in the old age homes: An overview. JMSD 2013;131-41.
Dotty PJ. The oldest old and the use of institutional long term care from an international perspective. In: Suzman R, Willis DP, Manton KG, editors. The Oldest Old. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992. p. 250-9.
Akbar S, Tiwari SC, Tripathi RK, Kumar A, Pandey NM. Development and standardization of scale to assess the satisfaction and expectation of older adults in old age homes. Indian J Sci Res 2014;4:645-50. Available from: http://www.ijsr.net
. [Last accessed on 2016 Mar].
Kamble SV, Ghodke YD, Dhumale GB, Goyal RC, Avchat SS. Mental health status of elderly persons in rural area of India. Indian J Basic Appl Med Res 2012;1:309-12.
Tiwari SC, Pandey NM, Singh I. Mental health problems among inhabitants of old age homes: A preliminary study. Indian J Psychiatry 2012;54:144-8. [Full text]
Nair SS, Raghunath P, Nair SS. Prevalence of psychiatric disorders among the rural geriatric population: A pilot study in Karnataka, India. Cent Asian J Glob Health 2015;4:138.
Hegde VN, Srinivas K, Rao S, Pai N, Mudgal SM. A study of psychiatric and physical morbidity among residents of old age home. Int J Health Sci Res 2012;2:57-74.
Kumar P, Das A, Rautela U. Mental and physical morbidity in old age homes of Lucknow, India. Delhi Psychiatry J 2012;15:111-7.
Purty AJ, Bazroy J, Kar M, Vasudevan K, Veliath A, Panda P. Morbidity pattern among the elderly population in the rural area of Tamil Nadu. Turk J Med Sci 2006;36:45-50.
Singh AP, Kumar KL, Reddy CM. Psychiatric morbidity in geriatric population in old age homes and community: A comparative study. Indian J Psychol Med 2012;34:39-43. [Full text]
Praveen Kumar BA, Udayar SE, Sravan S, Arun D. Depression and anxiety among the elderly persons from institutional and noninstitutional settings in the field practice area of a tertiary-care institute, Andhra Pradesh: A comparative study. Int J Med Sci Public Health 2016;5:2337-40.
Barua A, Ghosh MK, Kar N, Basilio MA. Prevalence of depressive disorders in the elderly. Ann Saudi Med 2011;31:620-4.
] [Full text]
Mohanty S, Pradhan S, Patra R. Depression in old age: Prevalence and predictors. Int J Health Sci Res 2016;6:206-12.
Seby K, Chaudhury S, Chakraborty R. Prevalence of psychiatric and physical morbidity in an urban geriatric population. Indian J Psychiatry 2011;53:121-7.
] [Full text]
[Table 1], [Table 2]