Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice
 


 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 1  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 14-16 Table of Contents     

Inca - interparietal bones in neurocranium of human skulls in central India


Department of Anatomy, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, India

Date of Web Publication10-May-2010

Correspondence Address:
A S Yogesh
Department of Anatomy, JN Medical College, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/0976-3147.63094

PMID: 21799611

Get Permissions

   Abstract 

Inca bones are accessory bones found in neurocranium of human skulls. Occurrence of Inca bones is rare as compared to other inter sutural bones such as wormian bones. These Inca ossicles are regarded as variants of the normal. The reporting of such occurrences is inadequate from Central India. Objectives: To find the incidence of Inca variants in Central India. Materials and Methods: In the present study, 380 dried adult human skulls were examined. All specimen samples were procured from various Medical colleges of Central India. They were analyzed for gross incidence, sexual dimorphism and number of fragments of Inca bones. Results: Gross incidence of Inca bones was found to be 1.315 %. Incidence rate was higher in male skulls than female skulls (male: 1.428%; female: 1.176%). The Inca bones frequently occurred signally. Out of the five observed Inca ossicles, two were fragmented. Conclusions: This data gives idea regarding gross incidence, sexual dimorphism and number of fragments of Inca bones in neurocranium of human skulls from Central India. The knowledge of this variable is useful for neurosurgeons, anthropologists and radiologists.

Keywords: Neurocranium, sutural bones, inca bones, central India


How to cite this article:
Marathe R R, Yogesh A S, Pandit S V, Joshi M, Trivedi G N. Inca - interparietal bones in neurocranium of human skulls in central India. J Neurosci Rural Pract 2010;1:14-6

How to cite this URL:
Marathe R R, Yogesh A S, Pandit S V, Joshi M, Trivedi G N. Inca - interparietal bones in neurocranium of human skulls in central India. J Neurosci Rural Pract [serial online] 2010 [cited 2014 Aug 1];1:14-6. Available from: http://www.ruralneuropractice.com/text.asp?2010/1/1/14/63094


   Introduction Top


The human skull is made up of 22 paired and unpaired ossicles, which are classified as viscerocranium and neurocranium. The neurocranial bones of variable size and shape are often encountered at the fontanellae or along the sutures. Inca ossicles are found in the line of the interparietal suture. Inca ossicles are bounded by lamdoid suture and sutura mendosa. They were previously known as os-Incae, os-ipactal, Goethe's ossicles. [1] Gordan, 1963, describing Inca said it resembles a triangular architectural monument design of the Inca tribe. [2] Inca bones were supposed to be present in the Inca tribals in South Andes - America 1200-1597 A.D. The members of Royal family of Inca tribe had crown-like configuration on their head. [3] Hence, thereafter, these ossicles have been known as Inca. The occipital bones ossify in four centers; one for membranous squamous part, one for the basal cartilaginous part and two for the condylar part of the occipital bone. [4] Inter-parietal bones may occur due to failure of fusion between primary and secondary centers of ossification of occipital bone. [5]

The occurrence of Inca variable is rare. The skull bone fractures in infancy and early childhood may associate with large intersutural bones. These Inca bones may give a false appearance of fracture on Roentgenographs. Such bones may produce complications during burr-hole surgeries and their extensions may lead to continuation of fracture lines. Due to clinical implication information of presence of Inca bones, their incidence, sexual dimorphism and number of fragments is essential to clinicians. Many researchers have reported Inca and other neurocranial variables throughout the world. [6],[7] The presence of Inca osssicles may be used as corroborative evidence for familial identity in medico legal cases. [8] Data on incidence, sexual dimorphism and number of fragments of Inca bones from Central India is underreported. Hence, this study was undertaken to find the incidence of this variant in the Central India.


   Materials and Methods Top


The study was conducted at the Department of Anatomy of a tertiary care hospital and medical college of Central India during 1992 to 1994. A total of 380 dried adult human skulls were examined for the study. All the samples were procured from various medical institutes in Central India. All selected samples were without any signs of ante-mortem or post-mortem injuries. They were analyzed for the gross incidence, sexual dimorphisms and number of fragments of Inca ossicles. The collected data was analyzed statistically.


   Results Top


Gross incidence of Inca ossicles was 1.315 % (5 Inca bones in 380 skulls) [Figure 1],[Table 1]. Sexual dimorphism for the presence of Inca bones was observed. Incidence rate was higher in male skulls than female skulls (male: 1.428%; female: 1.176%) [Table 1]. Out of the five observed Inca ossicles, two were fragmented.


   Discussions Top


Inca ossicles are accessory bones found in human skulls as interparital bones. Gross incidence of Inca ossicles was 1.315 %. A very high incidence (27.71 %) of Inca ossicles was found in the pre-hispanic skulls dated between 300-1200 A.C. [9] Berry et al. reported 2.9 to 4.6 % incidence in American population of South West coast, which is higher than that of present study. [6] Tsunehiko et al. also reported low incidence of Inca ossicles in Asians as compared to new world Population. [10] Reported a different incidence in population of North India (0.4%). [11] These findings might be indicative of natural evolutionary changes, probably swinging on either side of the spectrum.

The present study reports an incidence of higher in male (male: 1.428% and female: 1.176 %) for the female skull, which was in concurrence with the incidence rates of Berry and berry (Male: 4.6 % and Female: 2.9%). [6] In the present study, maximum of two fragments of Inca bones were observed in three skulls. Purkait and Chandra classified Inca ossicles on a developmental basis. [8] They numbered the four ossification centers from left to right as 1, 2, 3 and 4, out of which 1 and 4 represented lateral ossification centers while element 2 and 3 represented the medial ossification centers. The respective contributing component is indicated with their numbers prefixed by the term Inca, e.g. if Inca observed in adult skull is contributed by nonfused medial pairs of centers, then it is known as Inca 2 and 3; if the centers were fused, the so formed Inca is termed Inca 2, 3. The nomenclature of Inca ossicles as per Purkait- Chandra classification found in the present study is indicated in [Table 2].

The occurrence of Inca ossicles in skulls may be explained on the basis of embryological and evolutionary development of skull. The chondrocramium of fish skull and its components are forerunners of human skull base. These primitive components can be distinguished in the genesis of human skull. [12] This ossification center appeared in fetal skulls in 2 nd and 3 rd months of intrauterine life. [13] The appearance of additional centers for ossification may lead to occurrence of Inca bones.


   Conclusions Top


Meticulous knowledge regarding gross incidence, sexual dimorphism and number of Inca ossicles in human skulls in Central India may be useful to neurosurgeons, orthopedic surgeons, anthropologists and radiologists.

 
   References Top

1.Williams PL, Bannister LH, Berry MM, Collins P, Dyson M, Dussek JE, et al. The skull. In. Gray's Anatomy, 38 th edi, London: Churchill Livingstone; 1995. p. 583-606.  Back to cited text no. 1      
2.Gordon S. The Book of knowledge. 6 th ed. London: Waverlay Book Co. Ltd.; 1963. p. 161-6.   Back to cited text no. 2      
3.Moseley M. The Incas and Their Ancestors. In. The Archaeology of Peru. London: Thames and Hudson; 1992. p. 8.  Back to cited text no. 3      
4.Standring S, Borley NR, Collins P, Crossman AR, Gatzoulis MA, Healy JC, et al. External Skull. In. Gray's Anatomy, 40 th ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2008. p. 411-8.   Back to cited text no. 4      
5.Matsumura G, Uchiumi T, Kida K, Ichikawa R, Kodama G. Developmental studies on the interparietal part of the human occipital squama. J Anat 1993;182:197-204.  Back to cited text no. 5      
6.Carolineberry A, Berry RJ. Epigenetic variation in the human cranium. J Anat 1967;101:361-79.  Back to cited text no. 6      
7.Nayak S, Soumya KV. Unusual sutural bones at pteryon. Int J Anat Vari 2008;1:19-20.  Back to cited text no. 7      
8.Purkait R, Chandra H. The identity of Inca, medicolegal importance and suggested nomenclature of variants. J Anat Soc Ind 1989;38:162-71.  Back to cited text no. 8      
9.Garcia HF, Murphy EG. Frequency of interparietal bone or Inca bone in pre-Hispanic atacamenos skulls of the north of Chile. Int J Morph 2008 in press.   Back to cited text no. 9      
10.Hanihara T, Ishida H. Os Incae: Variation in frequency in major human population groups. J Anat 2001;198:137-52.   Back to cited text no. 10      
11.Singh PJ, Gupta CD, Arora AK. Incidence of interparietal bones in adult skulls of Agra Region. Anat Anz 1979;145:528-31.  Back to cited text no. 11      
12.Larson WJ. Development of head and neck. Human Embryology. 3 rd ed. Pennsylvania: Churchill Livingstone; 2001. p. 355-78.   Back to cited text no. 12      
13.Ranke J. Der Stirnfortsatze der Schalafenschuppe bei den Primaten. S Math Phys Cl Ak Wiss Zu Mun 1898;27:227-70.  Back to cited text no. 13      


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]


This article has been cited by
1 Presence of wormian bones - A medico-legal perspective
Prakash, K.G. and Vidya, C.S. and Rajkumar, K.R.
Indian Journal of Public Health Research and Development. 2013; 4(1): 229-232
[Pubmed]
2 Os Incae morphometric, clinical and medicolegal perspectives
Kumud, D.
Journal of the Anatomical Society of India. 2011; 60(2): 218-223
[Pubmed]
3 Interparietal (Inca) bone: a case report
UDUPI, S. and SRINIVASAN, J.K.
International Journal. 2011; 4: 90-92
[VIEW] | [PDF]
4 Os Incae Morphometric, Clinical and Medicolegal Perspectives
Dharwal Kumud
Journal of Anatomical Society of India. 2011; 60(2): 218
[Pubmed]
5 Interparietal and pre-interparietal bones in the population of south coastal Andhra Pradesh, India
Bhanu, P.S., Sankar, K.D.
Folia Morphologica. 2011; 70(3): 185-190
[Pubmed]
6 Variant morphogenesis of squamous part of occipital bone in human skulls
Murlimanju, B.V., Prabhu, L.V., Paul, M.T., Pai, M.M., Krishnamurthy, A., Rai, A.
Journal of Morphological Sciences. 2010; 27(3-4): 139-141
[Pubmed] | [PDF]
7 Surgical implications of wormian bones in the lambdoid suture
Natekar, P.E. and De Souza Fatima, M.
Indian Journal of Otology. 2010; 16(JUNE): 31-34
[Pubmed]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
    Introduction
    Materials and Me...
    Results
    Discussions
    Conclusions
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3921    
    Printed252    
    Emailed6    
    PDF Downloaded245    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 7    

Recommend this journal